911 Failure: Bulova Proposes Task Force
Fairfax County Executive Ed Long gave a special report to supervisors Tuesday.
In the four hours following the June 29 derecho, 911 calls received in Fairfax County increased 415 percent above normal. But in the early morning hours of June 30, 911 service failed. Officials want to know why.
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chairman Sharon Bulova intends to propose a task force to investigate the 911 failure at a meeting of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments on Wednesday, she said during Tuesday's regular Board of Supervisors meeting.
The director of Fairfax County’s emergency communications center told the Washington Post it took Verizon roughly three hours to officially notify the county that 911 was down, after the emergency line went out at 6:30 a.m. on June 30, the Post reported.
The 911 problems in Arlington, Fairfax County, Prince William County and elsewhere started in the aftermath of the June 29 derecho, and were not fully cleared until July 3 in some areas. The main culprit seems to have been a Verizon "trunk line" in Arlington.
The rare storm resulted in the death of four Fairfax County residents and nine others in Virginia. It left more than a million people in Virginia, Maryland and D.C. without electricity during the hottest week of the year. More than 100 homes in Fairfax County were damaged by falling trees and debris, and more than 120 intersections were left without traffic lights, creating significant dangers for pedestrians and drivers.
Social Media, Text and In-Person Communications
Hunter Mill District Supervisors Catherine Hudgins was deeply concerned with the county’s communication problems in a time of such crisis, saying the county should be able to act as a 911 service if the emergency hotline is not available.
Mount Vernon District Supervisors Gerry Hyland urged county staff to come up with a system that communities and neighborhoods could enact — such as door-to-door contact — so they could help each other in the event they cannot reach county or public safety officials.
"I think we have to do that because when 911 went out, they can't call anyone," Hyland said. "Drilling down to the basic community level … is essential to make sure that we don't miss anyone."
Supervisor Pat Herrity called, again, for the implementation of a 911 text messaging service.
"We also have a whole new generation that thinks first to text rather than call. I know the ability to text 911 has been successfully implemented in other jurisdictions in the country. I believe with the Commonwealth’s review of our 911 services, now is a good time to look at the potential to add this service so that 911 can be reached in the periods of high usage that normally occur after significant events," Herrity said.
Herrity will be serving on the state's panel reviewing 911 performance.
In a preliminary version of a report being prepared by county staff, County Executive Ed Long said there had been some difficulties getting the word out to residents during the height of the crisis.
Hudgins worried social media, while current and useful, wasn't enough to reach constituents when there's no electricity.
But Dranesville District Supervisor John Foust was more concerned with what he saw as a glaring lack of resources.
"Recognizing the efforts of the resources that we have is not the same thing as saying we have adequate resources, because I honestly believe that we did not," he said.
Broadcasting Cooling Centers Information
Foust said the county information about "cooling opportunities," or places where residents could go to escape the heat and maybe charge their phones, should have been broadcast on the radio and made more widely available.
According to Long's report, all county facilities that had electricity were open to the public as cooling centers. But many county facilities were without power, a fact Supervisors didn't think was conveyed well to the public.
"I think we did have a failure with opening and advertising cooling centers," said Springfield District Supervisor Pat Herrity.
Although supervisors did have criticisms of how the situation was handled and recommendations for improvements, all agreed county staff and public safety officials worked hard and admirably in their response.
Sully District Supervisor John Frey called it "tremendous," adding: "There was no advanced warning. This was not a hurricane that we had followed or a snow storm that we had prepared for."
"We were successful in some areas, we were unsuccessful in other areas," Long said. "We can do better and we want to use this event to figure out we can do better so that when the next incident comes we can be better prepared."
Fairfax County Patch sites are on Facebook! Keep up with regional news from Patch by becoming a fan here. And remember to follow @fairfaxcopatch on Twitter, too!
Jo Ann Stewart
11:39 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The non responsiveness for Verizon is not acceptable. Their contract for the 911 call system should be reviewed and they should have a hefty fine put on them for their failures. On Saturday morning after the storm I did not have cell phone service until the afternoon but did have text. My service is AT&T and people who had Verizon did not even get my texts until Sunday night or Monday. Plus people complain that electrical lines on Poles is the main problem--not necessarily. All my lines were under ground and they had to dig huge 6 foot deep holes to replace them. I think that Dominion Power and Verizon should be required to keep up their infrastructures and have adequite emergency plans in place--obviously they do not. Saying that we had no warning and the storm was bigger or bader then we have seen is no excuse. We were suppossed to have learned from 911 how to prepare for a disaster-whether it is man made or natural makes no difference. God help us if it is the former in the near future.
Sandra
11:55 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
We have all of our communications services through Verizon, and it was a mess. Our landline was even out of service for about 3 days, our cell service was spotty (lines kept dropping), and our internet was out for 5 days! We were pretty much unreachable during that time, and had there been an emergency, it's doubtful whether or not we would have been able to call out, even if 911 was working. What makes me maddest was that Verizon had a stock answer for everything, constantly telling me that our service would be restored in "24 to 48 hours", even though that wasn't true (I would wait, find my service was still down, call again, and get another "it'll be fixed in 24 to 48 hours". Hey Verizon, at least be truthful with your customers and let us know when something's going to take a long time to fix. At least that way we can make contingency plans!