POLL: What Are Your Thoughts on Occupy D.C.?
Should they be allowed to stay or not?
On Sunday, several National Parks Service workers started getting rid of some of the debris at the Occupy D.C. site at Freedom Plaza.
According to the Washington Post, the Park Service announced Jan. 27 that it would begin enforcing its long-standing regulation prohibiting camping on federal parkland Jan. 30. Protesters living at the two Occupy D.C. sites, including McPherson Square, were warned to stop camping overnight in the parks and remove all sleeping gear and other equipment — or risk arrest.
According to OccupyDC.org, the group of protesters are part of a nonviolent occupation of public space in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street and Occupy movements everywhere. According to the website, the group is a grassroots movement empowering the 99 percent to have a say in returning the country to a just political and economic system.
There was no violence Sunday. Instead people gathered in groups and cried and talked amongst themselves.
What are your views on the Occupy movement?
Jody
2:31 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
At least the Occupiers are talking about the issues. We do need campaign finance reform that gets big corporate & union money out of politics. We do need tax reform so that profits on non-productive stock market investing isn't taxed at 15% and so that we have other options for our retirement savings instead of sending all our capital to Wall Street in 401(k)'s/403(b)s. The stock/bond market should return to being a rich person's game (for people who can afford to lose their investment) and not become another institution that is too big to fail because so many of us have our retirement money invested there. Look at all the state pension funds that are now underwater. It's a big game! No one understands Wall Street! How did they bounce back so fast after total meltdown??? The banks/mortgage companies/stock bundlers got off scot free but no one helped the homeowners who lost their homes. We need big government to scale down, close the Dept. of Education and others, outlaw unionization of public employees, stop illegal immigration and its costs and give people back control over their own retirement funds to invest as they see fit. We send too much money to Washington; we need to keep it in our communities.
Fred Van Doren
3:17 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
A "just political and economic system" might be tad too optimistic. The country as a whole, however, likes optimistic ideas and movements. American's wouldn't have a country if that wasn't true. The flip side is that American's don't do pessimism well and clearly we don't want people to show us the downside of our system of governance. Most Americans would agree that that we are having some birthing pains about what we want to be when we grow up. But grow up is what we're going to have to do to fix the systemic issues. Simply put, the answer is not deleting the government and putting the citizens into a Madd Maxx you're on your own movie script. It looks good on film (especially if your an angry sort) but in the real world of pain and suffering, it's an adolescent idea. My suggestion to the OWS folks: do exactly what the tea party folks did. The tea party had an ideology of what they wanted the country to look like. They worked from inside the system to change the current system of governance. Good for them for exercising their rights. Now it's up to you. No need to protest, get out, get organized and vote in people who represent what you want your government to look like or elect the party that is closest to those ideals. If you want to go hang out in your tree houses and throw marshmallows at people because your angry, do it on your own time. If you want to act like adults, then it's time to put away the childish ways and get to work. http://tinyurl.com/7khyhvf
Alva Goldbook
7:24 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Fred, sadly, that's just not workable. Our representative government has been hijacked and overthrown by a Wall Street plutocracy. If it was possible to solve this problem by working within the system, this would have been fixed already. Our government has become reform-proof. The only way anything is ever going to change is if the 99% wages a war against the 1% the same way the 1% has been waging a war against them. If the 99% doesn't do something to defend themselves, then this entire nation is going one day look like Haiti, and there will be no middle class left.
Dave Phelps
3:24 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
anarchists and pigs, the DC taxpayers footed the bill for these bums. They should be required to work off the cost.
Ann H Csonka
3:45 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Did u notice that these sites are on Federal land, operated by the Natl Park Service? (first line of article) Therefore, ALL U.S. taxpayers share in the cost of cleaning up. OWS should be more careful and clean, pack out what they bring in, etc. They were better at first, but they still are doing a service to our nation by spending their time on behalf of all of us to re-orient our "Wall St -centered economy" toward invigorating all the Main Streets.
t
Dave Phelps
2:19 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Sorry Ann, the DC police and others are involved in "policing" the two sites, racking up OT and taking police protection away from other parts of the city, where, no surprise, crime has increased during the OWS. And they are doing nothing on anyone's behalf, other than their own self-centered egotistic aggrandizement. They could invigorate Main Street by, gasp, getting a job, supporting themselves and their families. Anarchists who believe that the world owes them something for nothing. They are no better than the crooks who messed things up on Wall Street or in the Congress. One of their early demands - when you believed they were good -- was that everyone should get a minimum pay of $20 per hour, whether they had a job or not. Yeah, great idea!!!
Alva Goldbook
7:25 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
What's wrong with anarchists?
Mike
4:25 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Instead of giving a lengthy explanation, I will just supply this as to why I do not support OWS.
http://www.owsexposed.com/documents/OWS-By-The-Numbers.pdf
Mac Smith
10:19 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
The poll is too black and white. The protestors have a right to stay and the city has a responsibility to the residents to keep the area clean. The two groups are doing a good job of shooting for a balance. This is in contrast to the way other cites, like Oakland, did not do a good job of supporting the community and the protestors. The DC protest has actually been a very good example of who to protest and how to manage such protests by law enforcement.
Ann H Csonka
10:29 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
I like Marc's comments.
In general, OWS people should be allowed to stay -- and I support OWS philosophically.
HOWEVER, they should figure out a way to keep the area c-l-e-a-n. I am certainly not a neatnik, but stuff should not get filthy. They want to "camp" in a city public park -- fine, but camp as you would in a state or national forest or other natural area.
What you pack in is what you pack out. "NO TRACE" camping is quite do-able, except for degradation of turf. They should try harder.
Alva Goldbook
4:06 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Some of these comments are really pathetic. These people are staying out in the cold day in and day out as a last recourse to save our republic from a Wall Street plutocracy. And these people are bemoaning messy parks? Really? JFK said, "people who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable." When wide scale violence breaks out to return this nation to a functioning democracy, be glad that you at least have a clean park to go to.
Dave Phelps
10:19 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Who in the world could take 4 or 5 months off from work or life and live like pigs illegally in a park in DC, or anywhere else? Only rich kids or bums. Sympathy for these pigs, none here. Take a bath and get a job. But no, it is the people who do go to work every day, pay taxes to the DC government who have to foot the bill for human scum -- and that deprecates scum, for which I apologize.
Alva Goldbook
11:25 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
What makes you think these people took off work to do this? I personally know people at Occupy DC, and some of them are employed and go when they can, and some haven't been able to find work. Gee, I wonder if you would have called the World War I vets who set up "Hoovervilles" all across the country "human scum" too?
Mike
10:52 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Sorry Alva, claiming that sad gaggle of hypocritical miscreants in DC (or any city for that matter) are somehow involved in some great sacrifice, struggling to represent the "99%" is pathetic.
It has devolved into a group of people committed to supporting left-wing policies. While they protest the prostitutes on Wall Street, they do nothing to address the pimps in Washington who allowed them to get away with what has many people angered. The claim of wide scale violence breaking out would be the result of the same gaggle of face covered people who trash property at G20 protests. The only people who support their actions are fringe left-wing groups, and the last thing they support is a return of a functioning democracy.
What started as something I would have supported, as time passed, has devolved into the joke that it is today. It is all well documented.
Occupy Movement - Get A Job!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kv22Vkx9bis#!
Occupy D.C. Protesters Lash Out at Police
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ul3OFY6KApk#!
Occupy DC Pushes Grandma Down Stairs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgcRlrt2ZL4&feature=related
#Occupy Protester Defecates In Public Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl1ObUGAoHE&feature=player_embedded
Alva Goldbook
11:31 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Yes, supporting getting money out of politics is a left wing idea. Prosecuting Wall Street for the biggest white collar crime wave in world history is a left wing idea. Prosecuting banks for throwing people out of their homes when the bank has no proof that the house is their property is a left wing idea. Getting money out of politics is a left wing idea.
The simple reality here is that Washington is bought and paid for, and they make decisions for those who pay them. Last I checked that was a crime called BRIBERY. Citigroup even called the US political system, in their own view, a "plutonomy". Functionally speaking, we have ceased to be a democratic republic.
Now, you tell me what the blue hell should be done to fix this? If you've got a better idea than to Occupy, then I'm all ears.
Dave Phelps
5:19 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I am sure their parents are proud. Defecating in the street, beating up an old lady. Yeah, these people are really examples of the best of America. Best of the anarchists and bums that is. How would one of you liberals like to have these people living next door to you. HMMMM?
Alva Goldbook
6:40 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Dave, you can throw childish insults at them all you like, but you didn't answer the question. Washington is bought and sold. Our representatives have ceased to be representative. How do you fix this?
Dave Phelps
11:13 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Alva, that we have crooks in NYC -- and I would add in DC, think Solindra -- is not a surprise. How do we fix this? I know, lets camp in parks, rape women, defecate in the street, beat up old women, live like pigs so that rats infest our camp site. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Alva Goldbook
4:27 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Dave, again, you fail to answer the question. How do you solve this problem? You got a better idea, I'm all ears.
Mike
12:55 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
@Alva You did not differentiate what OWS once was, and what it has devolved into. All of those things you pointed out would make any reasonable person upset at banks and Washington. What it has devolved to is a movement where left-wing organizations are showing solidarity for, and trying to capitalize on. That is the difference that occurred over time.
I put my money where my mouth is by donating to and supporting organizations that have nothing to do with OWS.
Alva Goldbook
6:43 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
How does one measure what an incredibly diverse movement has devolved into to? One of the things OWS is doing is preventing people from being (illegally, mind you) evicted from their homes. Do you support banks using fraud to evict people from homes that they don't even own? If not, then what are YOU doing to prevent it? If you've got a better idea of how to address this than what OWS is doing, then I'm all ears.
Dave Phelps
5:00 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
five months living off the backs of DC taxpayers, trashing 2 beautiful parks, infesting them with rats, rapes, murders -- all sorts of wonderful things happened there. Looking for work? give me a break, the vast majority of this scum are left wing radicals and anarchists. If you know some who are employed, good for you, but I have my doubts. GROW UP, take a bath and get a job is the message they need to hear.
Alva Goldbook
6:49 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
And how many years has CitiGroup, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo lived off of taxpayers? The criminals in these organizations have done more than "trash parks". They've trashed the world's entire economy. They've turn cities into ghost towns. They have cost America trillions. They bribe elected officials. They profit from war crimes. And you're calling the only group trying to address this problem "scum"? Your childish and hateful rhetoric speaks volumes about the kind of person you are.
Mike
7:55 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
"Your childish and hateful rhetoric speaks volumes about the kind of person you are." Your ad hominem remarks at Dave Phelps and lack of specifics in what you state emphasize the weak stance and message of OWS. A movement in which you state certain things, but the reality of the countless youtube videos and pictures I see of defecating in the street, etc. far outweighs what you state OWS to be.
Alva Goldbook
2:58 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Mike, are you really going to insinuate that the purpose behind OWS is dropping a load in the street? By the way, you do know that defecation is bio-degradable, don't you? :) It seems to me that since you have such strong feelings about waste products from biological organisms, that you'd be out in North Carolina or Tennessee protesting pig farms. You see, pigs defecate at about 4 times the rate of humans, and there are farms in NC with 2 million pigs on them. Think the total waste production equal to NYC without the sewers. These corporate farms deal with the waste by putting it in giant vats. Aren't free markets fun? The smell can be detected from miles around in the summer heat. By the way, these vats aren't all that secure either. They have sprung massive leaks, large enough to knock over entire churches and flood whole towns.
Dave Phelps
11:22 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
cute Alva, but the similarity of the pigs in NC and in OWS is apt. As I said, it seems to me that if these human waste -- pun intended -- wanted to accomplish something, living in tents for 5 months, defecating in public, assaulting an old lady, rape, etc would not be the way to do it. But then, they are left wing radicals and anarchists -- who apparently believe that toilets are a capitalist scheme to control the world too = made by profit seeking corporations. Gasp, the horrors!!!!!
Alva Goldbook
4:36 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Dave, you again fail to address the central issue. How do you solve the problem of getting money out of politics? Unless, of course, you have no problem with a business-run coup d'état. If that's the case, I guess I couldn't blame you for ignoring the issue. So, how much is the Boehner paying you to say this stuff?
http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/19/8896362-exclusive-lobbying-firms-memo-spells-out-plan-to-undermine-occupy-wall-street-video
patchfan
11:34 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
My answer - one that you left off of the survey
Yes - They are breaking the law.
Dave Phelps
5:54 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Alva, as stated, not by OWS. Money has always been in politics. Unions, Soros and the Hollywood liberal elite, on the left. some corporations on the right, some on the left too -- GE, Solindra, etc. Look at ancient Rome, when the top job, Consul, was often bought. Money and politics, always together. You think defecating in public, rape, rats and beating up old ladies is the solution? Communism was more corrupt than any system, anarchism is even worse, bombs and mayhem. Sorry, thems the facts. The solution? Elect the right people.
Alva Goldbook
1:58 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Dave, there is a difference between money having some influence on politics, and living in a nation where our republic has been overthrown with a plutocracy. Regardless of how you feel about it, when polled, 81% of the People (who are supposed to be running this little shindig) want to raise taxes on the wealthy. What happens? They get tax cuts. This is more than GE and Solindra. It's every sector of our politics. On the federal, state, and local levels. It's the declaration that "money is speech", meaning of course that unequal equality means unequal rights of speech. It means that a single billionaire can determine that Newt Gingrich is a candidate, instead of the voters. it's said that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Elect the right people? You mean we should choose the right fox to guard the henhouse. This isn't a hard problem to solve. Bribery used to be a crime that was prosecuted. When our representatives have ceased to be representative, then something more than elections are required to fix the problem. Occupation is one proposed model to address this issue. If you've got a better one, I'm all ears.
Fairfax Resident
10:54 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Alva - it is obvious that you support these folks - and perhaps some percentage of them are law abiding tax payers but that does not get away from the fact that they are costing the City and the rest ALL tax payers a lot of extra money. If you think for one minute that they are making an impression on Wall Street or the banks you are dead wrong. They are hurting ME personally as a business owner. They are hurting the City, Park Police and residents of D.C. by cutting into the time they can spend solving crimes and reducing crime in the neighborhoods that most need it. They are hurting the small businesses around their encampments by scaring away tourists, local customers and businessmen/women in the area who won't go near there. They are throwing themselves in front of cars, hitting police in the face with bricks, beating up private citizens, defecating in the parks and urinating in mason jars. Their waste feeds into our local streams and tributaries. It is all a part of the Chesapeake Bay water shed and human waste contaminates the soil. Not to mention the ever growing rat population because rats feed of waste - human, dog, etc... they find it to be a delicacy. There are other ways to hit the banks and Wall Street. Grassroots approaches such as joining local credit unions or small banks, only shopping in mom & pop stores, etc... OWS has become a joke and they are not the respected and upstanding human beings you tout them as being.
Alva Goldbook
11:47 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
FR, some percentage? You mean that they're all criminals sans a small minority of them? I guarantee you, what they're costing the city & tax payers is a itty bitty drop in the bucket what Wall Street's criminal behavior cost the tax payers & the economy in general. They are having an effect, as it certainly has waken up some Democrats that the class warfare being waged by the 1% against everyone else needs to be addressed. I could care less that they're hurting you as a business owner. When business owners stop hurting workers, then I'd give your complaint a moment of consideration. They're hitting the police in the face with bricks? Oh, the poor defenseless police! The truth is that it was a water bottle, and it flew out of someone's hand after 3 cops tackled the guy. Beating up private citizens? You're living in a fantasy world. The Move Your Money campaign came from OWS, it's just another part of the movement. The PURPOSE of occupation is to disrupt business-as-usual. That is what it is all about. It would end tomorrow if business would just stop their criminal behavior of bribing the People's representatives. Until then, I certainly don't see business owners doing jack about preventing banks from illegally evicting people from homes the banks don't even own. OWS, on the other hand, is doing exactly that.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/02/01/416772/occupy-detroit-foreclosure/
http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/06/real_estate/occupy_movement_spreads/index.htm
Mike
4:46 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Alva. So you support this treatment of small business owners as well? Kind of ironic, how OWS claims to be the champion of the 99%, but in we have these results…
SoCal Street Cart Vendors Hurting After ‘Occupy’ Group Splatters Blood, Urine
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/11/07/socal-street-cart-vendors-hurting-after-occupy-group-splatters-blood-urine
Occupiers terrorize us: eatery
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/occupiers_terrorize_us_eatery_o4dKzxi3n03WyJWAJu4AhO
Small-business owners tell Occupy Wall Street: You're hurting the 99 percent.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/1110/Small-business-owners-tell-Occupy-Wall-Street-You-re-hurting-the-99-percent
In actuality, here IS what OWS is doing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuFQuEwJ5xI&feature=player_embedded#!
And this is the result of these occupied parks and protests…
Stinking up Wall Street: Protesters accused of living in filth as shocking pictures show one demonstrator defecating on a POLICE CAR
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2046586/Occupy-Wall-Street-Shocking-photos-protester-defecating-POLICE-CAR.html
You can say all you want, but you cannot change the fact that these events have occurred. Period.
Alva Goldbook
7:13 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mike, let me ask this directly. Which is worse: leaving trash in a park, or destroying 20% of the net worth of the United States? Again, the point of occupying is to disrupt business-as-usual. Perhaps small businesses should do more to rein in big business that harms them at a far greater degree than these protests could ever hope to.
Your link from that conservative British tabloid, the Daily Mail, is interesting. Apparently, "defecating on a police car" is putting your ass on a police car. The "mounds of trash" look like camping supplies to me.
Dave Phelps
11:04 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Drink the koolaid Alva. It is clearly a waste of time to try to reason with someone who is incapable of, well, reason. Bye.
Alva Goldbook
1:34 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Taking your ball and going home so soon, Dave? I guess a reasoned point-by-point defense of OWS isn't what your employer had in mind, eh?
Mike
1:55 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
No Alva, troll feeding gets boring.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
Alva Goldbook
2:39 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Ah, so "Mike" and "Dave Phelps" is the same person? What were you saying about "trolls"?
Dave Phelps
3:51 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
No. we are not the same person. But I have to say that I tire of trying to put some sense into such a koolaid laden person.
I suggest that you go and live with the animals on OWS and see how you like it. For the betterment of man. I only pray, and I do, that you are not one of those animals victims.
I have a job and need to get back to work. The more I do this, the longer I have to stay at the office.
Bob Bruhns
5:41 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I think OWS would make more of an impact if they polled America online, using Numbers USA or something. That said, I agree that Big-Bucks strutting Wall Street peacocks seem to be breaking the economy, thanks to careless deregulation and outright non-enforcement. The US Government does not exist to prop up companies that overcompensate their executives and operate with the EXPECTATION that the government will rescue them if the big-shot games of their egomaniacal top-director types happen to crash their businesses. Banks and investment houses are supposed to be anchors of financial strength, not bungling comedy theaters with revolving doors into and out of top governmental positions. And government is supposed to represent the People, not rob them blind.